🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart nuclear talks with Washington as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed fresh requests had originated from mediators to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is navigating a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be proceeding from a position of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Terminated

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the US president claiming the sites had been eliminated. Subsequently, Western states employed their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that American atomic experts could function inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Diplomats stated on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in certain ways if discussions restart.

The American leader last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting consistent overtures from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of inactivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran states negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, designed to portray the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of international law, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be settled by armed force. He stated the attacks commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and coordination, making trust difficult to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Primary Solution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly tried to enforce their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the primary resolution to resolve disputes, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"In case they address to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and respect, they will get a response in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Iranian officials as the struggle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have identified our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and machinery, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more integrated, and more backing of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."