🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils will be cut by more than half, following a divisive law change that forced local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently spent years generating local support and pushing their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, saying communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to end “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to establish different electoral districts – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards indicated the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that chose to keep their seats.