🔗 Share this article

Champions of a independent schools founded to teach Hawaiian descendants describe a recent legal action targeting the enrollment procedures as a blatant effort to disregard the wishes of a Hawaiian princess who bequeathed her estate to ensure a brighter future for her population about 140 years ago.

The Heritage of Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop

These educational institutions were founded via the bequest of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, the great-granddaughter of Kamehameha I and the remaining lineage holder in the Kamehameha line. Upon her passing in 1884, the her holdings included approximately 9% of the archipelago's entire territory.

Her testament established the learning institutions employing those estate assets to finance them. Today, the system includes three sites for primary and secondary schooling and 30 early learning centers that emphasize learning centered on native culture. The schools instruct approximately 5,400 pupils across all grades and maintain an financial reserve of roughly $15 bn, a figure larger than all but around a dozen of the United States' top higher education institutions. The schools take not a single dollar from the federal government.

Competitive Admissions and Economic Assistance

Enrollment is highly competitive at each stage, with only about a fifth of applicants being accepted at the high school. These centers also subsidize about 92% of the cost of educating their students, with virtually 80% of the student body furthermore getting some kind of economic assistance depending on financial circumstances.

Past Circumstances and Cultural Importance

Jon Osorio, the dean of the Hawaiʻinuiākea School of Hawaiian Knowledge at the the state university, stated the learning centers were created at a era when the indigenous community was still on the decrease. In the late 1880s, about 50,000 indigenous people were believed to reside on the islands, reduced from a peak of between 300,000 to half a million inhabitants at the period of initial encounter with Westerners.

The native government was really in a uncertain kind of place, especially because the United States was becoming ever more determined in establishing a long-term facility at Pearl Harbor.

Osorio noted during the twentieth century, “nearly all native practices was being sidelined or even eliminated, or aggressively repressed”.

“At that time, the Kamehameha schools was genuinely the sole institution that we had,” the academic, a former student of the schools, commented. “The organization that we had, that was exclusively for our people, and had the potential at least of ensuring we kept pace with the rest of the population.”

The Legal Challenge

Now, the vast majority of those admitted at the schools have indigenous heritage. But the fresh legal action, filed in district court in the capital, claims that is inequitable.

The case was filed by a organization called SFFA, a activist organization headquartered in the state that has for years conducted a judicial war against preferential treatment and race-based admissions practices. The group sued the prestigious college in 2014 and ultimately secured a precedent-setting supreme court ruling in 2023 that saw the conservative judges eliminate ancestry-focused acceptance in post-secondary institutions across the nation.

A digital portal launched recently as a forerunner to the court case notes that while it is a “outstanding learning institution”, the centers' “admissions policy openly prioritizes learners with Native Hawaiian ancestry instead of applicants of other backgrounds”.

“Actually, that preference is so pronounced that it is essentially not possible for a student without Hawaiian ancestry to be admitted to the schools,” the group states. “We believe that emphasis on heritage, instead of merit or need, is unjust and illegal, and we are committed to stopping the institutions' unlawful admissions policies through legal means.”

Legal Campaigns

The effort is led by Edward Blum, who has overseen organizations that have lodged more than a dozen legal actions challenging the use of race in schooling, industry and throughout societal institutions.

The strategist declined to comment to media requests. He stated to a different publication that while the association supported the Kamehameha schools’ mission, their programs should be accessible to the entire community, “not just those with a certain heritage”.

Educational Implications

An education expert, a faculty member at the education department at Stanford, said the legal action aimed at the educational institutions was a striking example of how the battle to reverse historic equality laws and policies to foster equal opportunity in educational institutions had transitioned from the arena of higher education to elementary and high schools.

Park noted conservative groups had targeted Harvard “with clear intent” a in the past.

In my view the focus is on the Kamehameha schools because they are a very uniquely situated establishment… much like the manner they picked the college with clear intent.

Park explained although preferential treatment had its opponents as a fairly limited tool to increase education opportunity and admission, “it was an crucial tool in the repertoire”.

“It served as a component of this more extensive set of guidelines available to learning centers to increase admission and to build a fairer education system,” she commented. “Eliminating that tool, it’s {incredibly harmful